30 June 2021
A collaborative research team at University College London (UCL) and the University of Southampton is helping to change this by exploring using Genetic Algorithms in ship design. Their highly interactive genetic algorithm-based layout exploration method enables naval architects to make essential decisions in a hybrid design process.
Developing a suitable general arrangement is critical to ensuring the successful design of all ships, from superyachts to aircraft carriers. How different spaces, such as bridges, crew quarters, control rooms etc., are sized and located is fundamental to guaranteeing safe and effective operations. It is a complex, time-consuming, and inherently iterative part of the design process since many different and often conflicting requirements must be balanced within the constraints of the vessel while ensuring that all aspects of the operations and human factors are considered.
A high-level general arrangement is considered for the first time in the conceptual phase of the design process, referred here to as Early Stage Ship Design. The primary purpose of this initial phase is to design several alternatives to the overall layout, which are then considered to assess their cost and performance trade-offs to clarify design requirements.
The many downsides of a laborious all-manual design approach combined with affordable computational power have urged researchers to start developing methods and tools that can automatically produce design options. Early examples of automated arrangement systems often focus on the “box packing” methodology to find the most efficient use of space for the given requirements. While they effectively use space, they may struggle to create a realistic or operable design. It is possible to add specific design constraints, but this can also be laborious and time-consuming, and reliable results are not guaranteed.
“Genetic Algorithms will not replace the role of a Naval Architect, but they will enable them to do their job better, providing them with a range of design options and their associated compromises”.
Work conducted by Bojan Igrec, Rachel Pawling and Giles Thomas of UCL in collaboration with Adam Sobey of The University of Southampton is looking to change how these design tools are structured to create a fast and reliable output.
The method uses a genetic algorithm-based optimisation tool to generate and evaluate a set of general arrangement options rapidly. Rather than attempting to create an optimised design in one step, the toolset splits the design process into discrete sections to imitate the steps taken by an experienced human arrangement designer. The method is multi-level and strictly hierarchical, whereby the vessel is divided into a set of sub-units used as “containers” for allocating and arranging lower-level units.
First, the ship is split into decks (the highest level units) to calculate the available volumes and areas. Next, system routings and passageways are mapped-in to provide a first-level view of how the compartments can be arranged. The model is then divided into segments connected by the network of major routes in the so-called segmentation process, which considers requirements for watertight bulkheads. Next in the hierarchy are units of compartments that form zones and separate compartments that are allocated and arranged within segments in zoning and arrangement steps, respectively. Finally, utilising a relationship mapping database, the algorithm uses scoring solutions to assess thousands of different arrangements and configurations. Points are deducted for wasted space and overlapping compartments and for placing boxes in undesirable locations concerning themselves or other cases.
The key is allowing for dynamic node-based segmentation and choosing the proper rules. Instead of rigidly sticking to the initial mapped arrangement, it will enable the computer to explore the solution space and the options of moving boundaries and watertight bulkheads.
Providing more meaningful information and options analysis helps the naval architect minimise design risk and clarify the design route in a shorter timeframe. If these tools can be developed, they will enable the human user to rapidly assess and compare the different design solutions as part of the parametric analysis. Arguably one of the essential parts of the entire toolset is the inherent knowledge and database of ship design arrangement scoring, which uses historical data, design rules/regulations and user surveys to create a matrix of the different ship compartments and how they should be placed within the ship and relative to each other. This scoring matrix can be used in its own right as a tool to objectively score and grade any general arrangements fed into the system. This process is famously subjective and relies on expert knowledge and experience.
Professor Giles Thomas, BMT Chair at UCL explains, “Genetic algorithms will not replace the role of a Naval Architect, but they will enable them to do their job better, providing them with a range of design options and their associated compromises.”
He adds, "There is no such thing as a perfect ship design. There is always compromise and trade offs to be made between requirements; the General Arrangement Optimisation Tool being developed by UCL and BMT enables these options to be compared and assessed in an objective manner.”
BMT supports their research, and while the toolset is still in development, initial trials show great potential for use in Early Stage Ship Design exploration work. If you would like to know more about their work and how BMTusesg their toolset to make its ship designs better, faster and more affordable, please get in touch.
Giles Thomas is BMT Chair of Maritime Engineering in University College London’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. Giles has been at UCL since 2014 but before then he was working for the Australian Maritime College at the University of Tasmania for nearly 11 years. A naval architect, his research focusses on the performance of ships, boats and offshore structures. He is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects (RINA) and a Chartered Engineer (CEng – Engineering Council of Great Britain).
He currently leads a team of researchers at UCL investigating a range of different areas, from data analytics on full scale ship measurements to implementing virtual reality in the ship design process.
He is a three-time recipient of the Medal of Distinction from the Royal Institution of Naval Architects and was awarded the Vice Admiral E. L. Cochrane Award in 2019 by the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
Jake Rigby is the Research and Development Lead, responsible for the portfolio management of internal research projects in defence. This covers a broad range of research topics from ship and submarine design to digital twins and artificial intelligence. Through this role he leads the horizon scanning activities of BMT, tracking external trends and developing the reactive technology roadmaps. He is always on the lookout for the next emerging technology that can revolutionise or incrementally change the way we and our customers operate. He is a chartered engineer and Member of the Royal Institute of Naval Architects originally training as a Naval Architect specialising in ship signatures before his current role of R&D lead. He is a proud member of range of different industry research and technology forums; one of which is the recently formed Maritime Research and Innovation UK (MarRI-UK) for which he leads the “Clean Maritime” research theme. This is an area he is particularly passionate about, investigating how industry, government and academia can work together to provide an economical and sustainable future for the maritime sector.
Jake is also responsible for Academic Engagement at BMT. In recognition of his work to progress Academic Engagement in the maritime sector he was recently awarded the title of Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Exeter, and continues to engage in a range of collaborative research projects.
Through simulation-based numerical methods ship designers can perform complex analyses more rapidly and at a reduced cost. Johnathan Green explains how the successful application of numerical modelling has helped to de-risk and expedite delivery of new BMT landing craft designs.
The pandemic has accelerated the adoption of technologies for the shipping industry. The use of innovative tools and technologies can overcome border restrictions; for instance, with remote surveys and inspections, surveyors do not have to be physically present on-site or on board a vessel; instead, surveyors can now provide support, anytime, anywhere, with the use of the online connection, video streaming and other digital tools. But is a small survey the answer for every situation?
There are many ageing ports and port cities. In most cases, their central infrastructure was developed over the last 30-50 years, particularly for containers. As the design life for these structures is in the same range, they are approaching the theoretical ‘end of life. So, how do we analyse these structures and, where necessary, prolong their useful life?
Olivier van der Kruijs
For decades, the modus operandi of marine surveyors has not changed much. Sent by insurance companies or ship operators, the surveyor’s task is to collect evidence, to collect facts.