7 November 2023
Areas of risk identified
This year, Maersk faced two significant events involving crane cabin conditions which were missed during regular crane inspections. These cases highlight the need for better attention and careful evaluation of the crane cabins.
In one instance, a vessel's crane inspection indicated no structural concerns. However, subsequent reports and photographs from stevedores revealed cabin issues that had gone unnoticed during the survey. Reportedly, the damage didn't compromise the crane's operations, however it highlighted an essential omission during the evaluation process.
The crane operator's cabin shows areas of wastage and holes
Near Accident Wake-Up
Another situation came very close to a serious accident. Despite the inspection did not find any issues, pictures taken afterward by the stevedores clearly showed the cabin’s side window frame and nearby floor was excessively corroded and holed.
These cases remind us to not underestimate checking the condition of crane cabins. Maersk now asks for extra scrutiny on ships older than 15 years.
The crane operator's window frames exhibit signs of wastage
Seaspan inspection program
For Seaspan inspections we would like to highlight questions 2.13 and 3.9 which in some cases have been overlooked. We would like to emphasize that we need clear photo evidence regarding these items.
|
Question |
Description |
|
|
Are cable bulkhead penetrations and cable supports in apparent good order? |
|
|
The inspector should randomly verify if cable bulkhead penetrations and cable supports are not displaying excessive corrosion or if sealing material of the cable penetrations is missing. |
|
3.9 |
Is the control panel for the watertight doors operational and are watertight doors in apparent good condition? |
|
|
This question requires randomly verify the condition of watertight doors and the remote opening/closing mechanism. Water tightness depends on the condition of the sealing rubbers, the compression bar (knife edge), dog spindles, and wedges. |
Risk and Quality Manager / Senior Marine Engineer
Miguel has a Master of Science in Shipping Management.
After 5 years of seagoing experience as marine engineer on different type of vessels including general cargo vessel, bulk carrier and tanker, Miguel continued his career ashore with Port Operations and then as Fleet Supervisor.
He switched to the role of Risk Manager in 2018 when he joined BMT, dealing mostly with condition assessments of seagoing vessels.
Panagiotis Kasionis
Coal cargoes remain a high-risk “routine” trade. Panagiotis Kasionis, explores key risks, regulatory changes and practical insights for managing exposure across the supply chain.
Dr Thomas Beard - UK / Europe
As shipping transitions to low‑carbon fuels, safety has become the defining challenge. This interview by RINA's The Naval Architect, explores how alternative fuels such as methanol, ammonia, hydrogen and LNG introduce new risks, and how smart vessel design, layered protection and crew competence are essential to delivering decarbonisation without compromising safety.
Thomas Hendrikx
When cargo operations go wrong, the true challenge often lies beyond the technical cause. In this thought leadership piece, Thomas Hendrikx explores how proactive remediation, from rapid fact‑finding to stabilising operations and aligning multiple stakeholders, protects time, money and reputation. He explains why the real value isn’t just solving the visible problem, but preventing the next one.
Paddy Rynders
Mandatory container loss reporting is now a global requirement under IMO regulations. Discover what this means for safety, transparency, and how the industry can turn compliance into prevention.