20 October 2021
Rigour in programmes, projects and portfolios is about discipline in principles, processes and structure. The domain can be found in many people, from individuals (self), teams, and whole organisations. It depends on the culture and is often driven by external political, legal or societal norms.
This discipline can often be perceived as the antithesis of flexibility and agility when a high tempo is required. A high tempo can effectively address dynamic project environments – the rate at that changes can be made within a project or the frequency that the project reflects plans and adjusts according to the results of the preceding interval.
This short paper reviews some of the underlying issues. Briefly, it explores a few examples of approaches that can be used to address the challenges, drawing on lessons from existing programmes. It is part of a developing series that explores different tensions and aims to provoke thought, debate and consideration when designing or executing programmes and projects.
Andrew is an experienced transformational and operational capability change practitioner who can draw upon his practical and theoretical knowledge of the leadership and management of people and activities across the product generation, capability development and business transformational change cycles. From an engineering background in the aerospace sector leading teams in multi-discipline, multi-site and multi-cultural environments, Andrew now works for BMT Defence & Security where he advises clients in all aspects of complex change management. As well as being a Fellow of the APM and a Chartered Project Professional, Andrew is a UK and European Chartered Engineer, and a member of the Royal Aeronautical Society.
Leigh Storer is a Consultant within BMT Defence and Security UK. She has experience in a wide range of projects across the lifecycle as well as contract management. Leigh holds the APM PMQ and enjoys a versatile workload, including client work and involvement in the Research and Development area of BMT.
One of the most significant pressures on defence programme delivery is that of timescales and iterations: time vs tempo. In this paper, we explore answers to questions around programme viability, how we can adapt our programme models, behaviours and approaches and how to respond to tensions around time vs tempo successfully.
We discuss the value of deploying digital visualisation tools in the defence domain to satisfy specific, existing training requirements
More and more organisations are maturing their Asset Management approaches by applying ISO 55000 principles and recognised good practice to reach their long-term strategic outcomes or goals. In this context, BMT’s Stephen Hodson and Ewan Glen provide insight into four key strategic enablers to meeting the Greening Government Commitments for 2025 and the ambitious 2050 target for carbon neutrality (Net Zero).
Whether we like it or not, the world is facing a growing number of wicked problems – problems where there is no obvious route to resolution, and no agreement on the core challenges. With the incredible advances now seen in AI, to what extent can computer generated input support in ‘solving’ wicked problems?