2 February 2021
The Australian Defence Force has embarked on an ambitious capital program to provide our nation with future generations of warfighting capability. The Continuous Naval Shipbuilding program and the Land Combat Vehicle programs headline the ambitions for generating sustainable sovereign capacity.
Through lessons learnt from previous programs, including the Collins Class submarines and ANZAC Frigates, Australia has taken a deliberate and integrated approach to strategic capability investment and industry planning to guide the delivery of future capability.
There is a demonstrated intent to ensure that the programs deliver more than just capable platforms and that the fundamental inputs to capability are integrated from the start of the programs. The approach is exemplified by:
Development of Sovereign Capability through a deliberate and planned implementation of Australian Industry Capability
Developing procurement strategies that support a sustainable and enduring industrial base
Substantive decisions are now being made that will shape capability delivery for decades. Each program on its own is challenging and complex, yet many of the decisions around facilities, infrastructure, workforce, and supply chains require an enterprise approach. The complexity of systems, processes and concepts provides the opportunity for decision support tools to support choices that will shape the next generation of capability.
The Australian Defence enterprise embraces modelling and simulation to support sound capability, acquisition, and system decision-making.
Examples of different decision support applications of Discrete Event Simulation are:
Ensuring that the timing of infrastructure implementation does not impact the project or program schedule
Analyse Vessel Usage Upkeep Cycles to optimise operational availability. Achieving two extra operating sea days annually per platform equates to two additional years of active availability over a class lifecycle.
Test armoured fighting vehicle geographic disposition and transport options to ensure cost-effective availability meets the training and operational requirements.
Why use Discrete Event Simulation
Discrete Event Simulation models a system's operation driven by activities occurring at discrete instants in time (an event). It models and simulates the performance of real-life processes, facilities or systems and allows “what if” scenarios for increasing size and complexity problems to be tested and compared. The ability to focus on events enables the simulation of an entire process or capability lifecycle. Minor improvements can equate to substantial savings across an enterprise’s capability lifecycle.
Uncertainty and risk can be incorporated into the model, thoroughly examining the system. The modelling is easily verified, and results are presented quantitatively but importantly visualise the simulation, supporting stakeholder understanding and trust.
Developing a model provides the customer with a different and occasionally new perspective on existing processes and systems. The initial steps require a thorough and complete understanding of the existing or proposed system or process and force both the client and the modelling team to examine each step critically. The modelling process requires a collaborative approach.
Typical steps in developing the model and subsequent simulation and analysis are as follows:
Customer objectives and requirements are defined.
Data collection and analysis to accurately represent the system or process being modelled.
Model development is usually based on the existing system.
The model is verified and validated.
Options and scenarios are simulated.
Results are analysed, and recommendations are developed.
The initial steps are essential to maximising the effectiveness of the simulation and need an engaged and knowledgeable customer to define the objectives. The customer may deliver the model and perform the simulation themselves, especially when the underlying data is confidential.
Salty has over three decades of Defence and Security experience, including over 20-years with the Royal Australian Navy and employment with global defence companies, including Penske, Nova Systems and Thyssenkrupp.
Salty is based in Adelaide, Australia, but manages the delivery of multiple programs of work for our clients across Australia, New Zealand and Pacific island nations.
To reach him, email email@example.com
Our best defence against extreme weather events such as storm tides can be the restoration and enhancement of coastal ecosystems.
Artificial intelligence has revolutionised ship design and changed how we work forever. However, apart from improving computer-aided design (CAD) tools, the creation of ship arrangements is relatively the same as in the 1980s.
A variety of tensions exist in a project or programme, all of which affect how outputs and outcomes are delivered. One of these tensions is between Rigour and Tempo. In our latest whitepaper, we review some of the underlying issues and explore examples of approaches that can be used to address challenges, drawing on lessons from existing programmes.
One of the most significant pressures on defence programme delivery is that of timescales and iterations: time vs tempo. In this paper, we explore answers to questions around programme viability, how we can adapt our programme models, behaviours and approaches and how to respond to tensions around time vs tempo successfully.