27 March 2026
When something goes wrong in cargo operations, such as damage, contamination, suspected self-heating, or an unexpected delay, the first questions are usually framed as: what happened and how did it happen? These questions matter. Establishing facts, defining causation, and potential exposure is the foundation of good decision-making. But in our experience, the most valuable remedial work begins after those first findings, when the situation starts to expand beyond a technical issue into a commercial and operational one.
People often assume our role ends at inspection and reporting. In reality, remedial work is rarely a single action. It is a process.
We typically start by helping clients understand what they are facing:
But it doesn’t stop there. Once the facts are being established, we move into loss mitigation: reducing the financial and operational impact by identifying realistic options, mobilising the right parties, and helping to deliver a safe and workable outcome.
In many cases customers come to us with what appears to be a simple straightforward issue. This is normal because early in an incident, information in limited, time is short and attention is focused on what is most visible.
Once we start exploring “behind the scenes”, determining what else could happen, what might follow, and what the consequences could be, the situation is frequently more complex than it first appeared.
This is where remedial value is created. We’re not only answering the immediate question. We’re helping clients avoid the next problem, and the next cost, before they arrive.
In major incidents, two forces often multiply exposure:
1) Uncertainty
Sometimes, nobody can answer the most important operational question at the start, especially when there is a potential safety risk. There may be theories, guidance, and experience, but stakeholders still want a clear plan: what could happen, how likely it is, and how we will respond if it does.
2) Time
Delays quickly become costly. When assets sit idle and decisions stall, the cost line keeps moving, even if nothing “new” happens. Time becomes a cost driver in its own right.
Effective remediation shrinks uncertainty quickly and shortens the pathway to a controlled outcome. That is often where the greatest value sits.
In many cases, the technical cause is discoverable. What makes the situation difficult is that multiple parties must cooperate before anything can move forward.
We often find that the work becomes as much about:
When approvals, permits, or operational acceptance are needed, the plan becomes a prerequisite for progress.
A simple way to describe our remedial approach is:
1) Investigate (facts and exposure)
We establish what happened, what is still unknown, what the evidence indicates, and where exposure may exist.
2) Stabilise (risk and permissions)
We help build a credible plan that covers the operation and “what-if” scenarios. We support stakeholder alignment and the approvals needed to proceed safely.
3) Recover (loss mitigation and value salvage)
We identify realistic recovery routes - reconditioning, alternative processing, salvage options, or other pathways - to minimise time and cost escalation.
There are three things customers consistently tell us make the biggest difference:
Engage early – The sooner we’re involved, the more options there are to reduce impact.
Focus on outcomes – The best results come from asking “How do we recover value and reduce delay?” rather than only “What happened?”
Plan for the what‑ifs – A strong plan gives stakeholders confidence and creates the conditions for a smooth, safe resolution.
Ultimately, our role is to bring clarity to complex situations, protect our customers’ interests, and help them move forward with confidence - even when the problem is not yet fully understood.
Thomas Hendrikx, Mariner and Marine Consultant, is a dual‑educated maritime professional with a BSc in Nautical Studies and Marine Engineering. A Master Mariner with engineering qualifications, he has served on dry cargo, reefer and container vessels. With over 25 years’ experience, he specialises in investigating lashing failures, cargo shifts, contamination, and claims involving bulk, steel, general and perishable cargoes. Thomas is lead author of the Cargo Operations Manual for Nile Dutch and industry guidelines for project cargo, and co‑author of the American Club’s steel cargo guidance and Cargohandbook.com. An experienced expert witness in London arbitration, he also holds a diploma in Marine Incident Investigation. He is based in Rotterdam.
Paddy Rynders
Mandatory container loss reporting is now a global requirement under IMO regulations. Discover what this means for safety, transparency, and how the industry can turn compliance into prevention.
Paddy Rynders
Scrap metal fires on board vessels are rising worldwide. Understanding how they start and how to manage them demands investigators expertise in both fire behaviour and the marine environment.
N/A
We address certain key topics that have been brought to our attention by our valued clients during their assessment of inspection reports.
Dennis de Bruin - Global
Supply chain issues, post-pandemic delays and a lack of stacking space are typical challenges for a shipping line in today’s busy world. Our Managing Director of Surveys and his team provide detailed insight into distressed cargo management operations and how to extract value and upside in the face of a serious shipping incident.